Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Port placement and patient-specific docking strategies for robotic hysterectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: an international Delphi consensus

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
24Institutions déclarées
11Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it, pt, gb, in, dk, au, es, de, be, gr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Robotic-assisted hysterectomy is increasingly performed using modular platforms such as the Hugo™ roboticassisted surgery (RAS) system, but optimal or personalised docking strategies remain undefined. Objectives: To establish expert consensus on port placement and docking configurations for hysterectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system and to identify patient anthropometric factors requiring modification of standard setups. Methods: A modified Delphi consensus was conducted involving two iterative rounds of anonymous, structured questionnaires distributed to an international panel of gynaecological robotic surgeons experienced with the Hugo™ RAS system. Survey items addressed preferred docking configurations, the influence of patient anthropometry on docking strategy, and specific technical adjustments in non-standard scenarios. Consensus was predefined as ≥66.7% agreement. Main Outcome Measures: Expert agreement on docking setups, port placement modifications, and anthropometric variables influencing technical adjustments. Results: Seventeen experts completed round one and 16 completed round two. No single docking configuration reached consensus as universally optimal for standard hysterectomy. Ranking exercises identified the "standard" hysterectomy setup as the most preferred configuration, followed by the "alternate" and the "three-arm" setups. All experts agreed that patient anthropometry requires modification of port placement. Elevated body mass index (BMI), large uterine size and small pelvis were identified as key variables: increasing inter-port distance was recommended for BMI >30, cranial port displacement for large uteri, while no consensus emerged for patients with a small pelvis. A modified bridge configuration was proposed, and achieved strong expert agreement. Conclusions: No single docking configuration is deemed to be universally optimal for Hugo™ RAS hysterectomy. Expert practice combines a limited number of preferred setups with patient-tailored adjustments. What is New?: This study provides the first Delphi-based expert consensus on Hugo™ RAS docking strategies, emphasizing patient-specific adjustments and flexible preoperative planning.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Port placement and patient-specific docking strategies for robotic hysterectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: an international Delphi consensus
Date Crossref
18/03/2026
Éditeur
Galenos Yayinevi
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Minimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsUterine Myomas and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.