Genetic susceptibility of cardiometabolic outcomes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders

Résumé fourni par la source

Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) have a higher risk for post-diagnostic cardiometabolic comorbidities. While antipsychotic use partly explains this, the contribution of genetic susceptibility remains unclear. We investigated the relationships between cardiometabolic-related polygenic risk scores (PRSes) with cardiometabolic outcomes using data from 671 patients with SSDs in the Dutch Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis study. Seven PRSes were calculated for body mass index (BMI), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL, LDL), triglycerides, glucose, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) using summary statistics from most recent genome-wide association studies. Four linear regression models assessed the cross-sectional associations between PRSes and cardiometabolic outcomes including BMI, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin, SBP, DBP, and a composite metabolic score. Model #1 included baseline factors (age, sex, and population substructure); #2 included model 1 with a single-trait PRS; #3 included model 1 with all PRSes of designated traits; and #4 included model 1 and a composite PRS score. All seven cardiometabolic PRSes were significantly associated with their corresponding outcomes. Significant cross-trait associations were observed including PRS BMI with lower HDL (explained variance (R 2 ) = 2.33%), higher DBP (R 2 = 3.35%), and higher SBP (R 2 = 2.29%); PRS HDL with higher HDL(R 2 = 2.05%) and LDL levels(R 2 = 2.31%); PRS DBP with higher SBP(R 2 = 1.75%), and PRS SBP with higher DBP(R 2 = 2.94%). The current study suggests that genetic susceptibility contributes modestly but significantly to poor cardiometabolic outcomes. Shared genetic susceptibility may underpin the frequent co-occurrence of cardiometabolic morbidities in SSDs, supporting the potential utility of PRSes in identifying high-risk patients for early intervention in practice.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.