GNN-MA: Soft Molecular Alignment with Cross-Graph Attention for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Ligand-based virtual screening (LBVS) seeks strong early enrichment when searching ultra-large libraries, but practical screening often relies on 1D/2D descriptions while 3D information is expensive and uncertain due to conformer generation and alignment. We propose GNN-MA, a retrieval-style pairwise scoring model for query-candidate molecular pairs that uses molecular graphs as a unified representation. Built on intra-graph message passing, GNN-MA adds cross-graph attention to learn atom-level soft alignment that focuses on key substructures relevant to activity matching, and introduces a bond-to-atom semantic aggregation module to better exploit chemical bond cues for similarity scoring. The framework uses 2D molecular graphs derived from SMILES for retrieval-style matching and does not rely on explicit 3D conformational modeling or alignment. Experiments on DUD-E and LIT-PCBA show that GNN-MA achieves competitive overall discrimination (ROC-AUC) and, relative to its ablated variants, provides consistent gains in early-enrichment metrics (EF@1-5%) on DUD-E, while on LIT-PCBA the improvements are more target-dependent. The learned atom-level soft alignment also provides a qualitative interpretability cue in case studies. Throughput benchmarks suggest that GNN-MA is most suitable as a re-ranking/refinement model after a fast prefiltering stage.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- GNN-MA: Soft Molecular Alignment with Cross-Graph Attention for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening
- Date Crossref
- 16/03/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.