Lessons from Exceptional Responders with High-Grade Brain Tumors Treated with Precision Targeted Therapies
Rattachement africain : tr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Background High-grade gliomas are associated with dismal outcomes and have devastating neurologic sequelae. Standard-of-care surgery, radiation, and temozolomide yield a median survival of 14–16 months in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Methods We report four patients with high-grade glioma (two with GBM; one initially diagnosed with GBM, now classified as World Health Organization grade 4 IDH1- mutant astrocytoma; and one with oligosarcoma [grade 4]). Tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for all four patients, and they were treated based on their biomarkers. Results NGS yielded actionable alterations targeted after conventional surgery/chemoradiation therapy: imatinib (for KIT and PDGRA amplification) and bevacizumab (for KDR [ VEGFR2 ] amplification); everolimus (mTOR inhibitor for TSC2 and PTEN loss-of-function alterations); and ivosidenib (IDH1 inhibitor for IDH1 mutations in two cases, including the oligosarcoma). Three patients remain in radiographic and clinical remission at 39+, 48, and 52+ months; the patient with oligosarcoma showed clinical and imaging response lasting 8 months. Conclusions Our exceptional responders with high-grade gliomas suggest that biomarker-matched targeted therapy can benefit select patients with high-grade glioma and warrants prospective clinical trials.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lessons from Exceptional Responders with High-Grade Brain Tumors Treated with Precision Targeted Therapies
- Date Crossref
- 16/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Innovative Healthcare Institute
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.