Predicting Aviation Contrail Occurrence Using Bayesian Population Statistics From Reanalysis Data
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Despite the ongoing climate crisis and recent pandemic-induced disruption, the aviation sector is expected to experience 5% annual growth over the next decade. While the industry moves towards decarbonisation through use of sustainable fuels and improved operating practices, the contribution by non-CO2 effects become ever more apparent. Contrails and contrail-induced cirrus clouds contribute an estimated 57% to the sector’s total effective radiative forcing (ERF). Contrail avoidance methods are gaining ground as tools to strategically reroute flights to reduce their ERF by predicting contrail forming regions in advance.The task of prediction remains a challenge however, with typical methodologies employing either highly parametrised models that suffer from uncertainties, or machine learning methods that are heavily abstracted away from the background physics. We propose a novel, robust method for contrail prediction that leverages large-scale population behaviours. Using ERA-5 reanalysis and the OpenContrails dataset for over 50,000 confirmed contrails between 2019 and 2020 over North America, we train an informed contrail predictor using Bayesian methods which we verify on unseen data. We will present the results and statistical evaluation of this model, which we believe provides a scalable but interpretable contrail predictor that could be run using output from numerical weather prediction models.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Predicting Aviation Contrail Occurrence Using Bayesian Population Statistics From Reanalysis Data
- Date Crossref
- 13/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Copernicus GmbH
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Exeter pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Met Office pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
University of Exeter et Met Office.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.