Surgeon-patient Sex Concordance and Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Costs Following Common Surgeries

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: To evaluate the associations between surgeon-patient sex concordance, long-term clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. Background Data: Emerging data suggest surgeon-patient sex concordance may improve short-term outcomes, especially for female patients, yet its long-term effects remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing common surgeries in Ontario, Canada (2007-2019). Patients were followed for 90 and 365 days. Surgeon-patient sex concordance was categorized into four dyads. Multivariate generalized estimating equations clustered by procedure type evaluated composite and individual (complications, readmission, mortality) clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. Results: A total of 1,165,711 patients were included. Female patients treated by male surgeons, compared with female surgeons, were more likely to experience an adverse composite event (90 d: aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08–1.17, P <0.001; 365 d: aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05–1.14, P <0.001), with no association among male patients (90 d: aOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94–1.05, P =0.89; 365 d: 0.99, 95% CI 0.92–1.07, P =0.87). Long-term total healthcare costs were greater for patients treated by male surgeons - an effect seen in both male patients (90 d: aRR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14, P =0.002 and 365 d: aRR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14, P =0.007) and female patients (90 d: aRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.14, P <0.001, 365 d: aRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.14, P <0.001). Conclusions: Surgeon-patient sex concordance was associated with improved long-term outcomes for female, but not male, patients, and female surgeons’ patients had lower healthcare costs. Given these benefits, further investigation into the mechanisms driving these outcomes is warranted.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.