Age‐specific melanoma risk associated with melanocytic nevi: a pooled analysis from the M‐SKIP project
Rattachement africain : it, nl, gb, us, es, gr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Summary Objective This study investigates the association of melanoma risk with total‐body nevus count and the presence of atypical nevi in younger (< 40 years) and older (> 60 years) individuals. Methods A pooled analysis was conducted within the M‐SKIP project, based on multiple melanoma case‐control studies. Associations were assessed through study‐specific odds ratios (ORs), adjusted for potential confounders. Results Nine case‐control studies were included, analyzing common nevi (2,674 melanoma cases/2,343 controls) and atypical nevi (2,459 cases/1,740 controls). High common nevus count was associated with increased melanoma risk in both younger (summary [s]OR = 2.56; 95% CI 1.64‐4.01; I 2 = 31%) and older individuals (sOR = 2.06; 95% CI 1.06–4.00; I 2 = 67%), with no significant age‐group difference (p = 0.57). In contrast, younger individuals exhibited a markedly higher risk of melanoma associated with the presence of at least one atypical nevus (sOR = 4.84, 95% CI 2.18–10.76; I 2 = 65%) compared to older individuals (sOR = 1.71 95%CI 1.07–2.74; I 2 = 39%), with a p value for the difference of 0.02. Conclusions These findings suggest age‐specific differences in melanoma risk associated with nevus burden. Specifically, atypical nevi are a stronger risk factor in younger individuals. This could have significant implications for prevention strategies and clinical management, in particular for better identification of high‐risk groups for targeted secondary prevention efforts.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Age‐specific melanoma risk associated with melanocytic nevi: a pooled analysis from the M‐SKIP project
- Date Crossref
- 09/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.