Time-domain photometry and activity evolution of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS with BHTOM
Résumé fourni par la source
Time-domain photometric monitoring is essential for characterizing cometary evolution, particularly for rare interstellar objects with limited observing opportunities. We aimed to characterize the pre-perihelion photometric behavior and dust activity of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS and to test the capability of the Black Hole Target and Observation Manager (BHTOM) platform and telescope network for coordinated high-cadence non-sidereal observations. We obtained 70 days of time-series photometry of 3I/ATLAS from 2025 July 4 to September 11 using 16 telescopes and 1554 images. The data were processed and calibrated with the BHTOM pipeline. High-cadence multiband imaging was used to measure the rotation period and color evolution, while the dust activity was quantified via Af̊ho measurements. We present a pre-perihelion light curve of 3I/ATLAS from R_ h = 3.18 - 2.19 au, which exhibited a steady brightening by sim3 magnitudes with no evidence of anomalous behavior. We measured a rotation period of P_ rot = 15.98 ± 0.08 h. The colors were statistically non-changing, with only a weak, non-significant tendency for 3I/ATLAS to become bluer at 3.5 > R_ h > 2.2 au. The relative dust production increased from A(0^̧irc)f̊ho sim600 to 1100 cm, and the upper limit on the dust mass-loss rate increased from łeq 217 kg s -1 $ to łeq 328 kg s^-1. We measured an activity index of $n = -1.24 ± 0.02, which is consistent with a well-developed dust coma.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Time-domain photometry and activity evolution of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS with BHTOM
- Date Crossref
- 17/08/2026
- Éditeur
- EDP Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.