Active surveillance of cytomegalovirus and pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: risk assessment of high-dose steroids
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Opportunistic infections such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) pose major risks in critically ill COVID-19 patients, particularly those receiving high-dose corticosteroids. METHODS: We conducted weekly active surveillance for CMV and Aspergillus in 210 ICU-admitted patients with severe COVID-19. Incidence, timing, and risk factors were assessed, with a focus on corticosteroid dose. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were applied. RESULTS: CMV DNAemia (≥ 1000 copies/mL) occurred in 29.0% of patients, peaking during weeks 3–4. CAPA (possible + probable) occurred in 14.3% and peaked earlier, within the first two weeks. High-dose corticosteroid use was associated with significantly increased risks of CMV DNAemia (aOR 5.34; 95% CI, 2.69–10.58) and CAPA (aOR 2.28; 95% CI, 1.22–4.25). CONCLUSION: CMV and CAPA occurred in distinct temporal patterns, with CMV reactivation peaking later in the ICU course. High-dose corticosteroids significantly increased the risk of both infections, underscoring the need for tailored surveillance strategies during intensive care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Active surveillance of cytomegalovirus and pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: risk assessment of high-dose steroids
- Date Crossref
- 21/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.