Association between shoulder joint radiation dose and arm morbidity in the randomized breast cancer trial SENOMAC
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Postoperative lymph node irradiation can affect shoulder morbidity in breast cancer patients, yet widely accepted dose-volume constraints for the shoulder joint are lacking. The SENOMAC trial randomized patients with breast cancer and 1-2 sentinel lymph node (SLN) macrometastases to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or SLN biopsy only. We aimed to analyze the association between the radiation dose to the shoulder joint and patient-reported arm morbidity one and three years after surgery using SENOMAC data. METHODS: Radiotherapy plans from 868 Swedish SENOMAC patients randomized 2015-2019 were collected. The humeral head was auto-segmented, and a 1 cm margin added to represent the shoulder joint. Arm morbidity was assessed using the Lymph-ICF questionnaire, focusing on questions regarding physical arm function and shoulder-related mobility tasks. RESULTS: ) was associated with significantly worse arm morbidity scores three years after surgery, particularly among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery. No association was found in the ALND group. No dose thresholds for development of arm/shoulder related side effects could be identified. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a possible association between maximum radiation dose to the shoulder joint and subsequent side effects. Extended follow-up within SENOMAC will provide further insights into the incidence of arm morbidity in relation to radiotherapy dose over time.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Association between shoulder joint radiation dose and arm morbidity in the randomized breast cancer trial SENOMAC
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.