Volcanic plume height during the 2021 Tajogaite eruption (La Palma) from two complementary monitoring methods – implications for satellite-based products

Le résumé fourni par la source

Volcanic emissions from the Tajogaite volcano, located on the Cumbre Vieja edifice on the island of La Palma (Canary Islands, Spain), caused significant public health and aviation disruptions throughout the eruption (19 September–13 December 2021, officially declared over on 25 December). Nonetheless, it is considered the most significant volcanic event in Europe over the past 75 years due to the substantial amount of SO 2 released into the atmosphere. The Instituto Geográfico Nacional (IGN), the authority responsible for volcano surveillance in Spain, implemented extensive operational monitoring to track volcanic activity and to provide a robust estimation of the volcanic plume height using a video-surveillance network. In parallel, the State Meteorological Agency of Spain (AEMET), in partnership with other Spanish ACTRIS (Aerosol, Clouds, and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure) members and collaborating institutions, conducted an unprecedented instrumental deployment to evaluate the impacts of this volcanic event on atmospheric composition. This effort included a network of aerosol profilers surrounding the volcano. A total of four profiling instruments were installed on La Palma: one MPL-4B lidar and three ceilometers. Additionally, a pre-existing Raman lidar on the island contributed valuable data to this study. These efforts are undertaken due to the importance of monitoring volcanic plume height in terms of air quality (necessary for the implementation of effective civil protection policies), volcanic activity surveillance (for tracking and forecasting eruptive behaviour), and, from a scientific perspective, for improving our understanding of the climatic and radiative impacts of this type of aerosol. In this study, the eruptive process was characterised in terms of the altitude of the dispersive volcanic plume ( h d ), measured by both IGN and AEMET-ACTRIS, and the altitude of the eruptive column ( h ec ), measured by IGN. Modulating factors such as seismicity and meteorological conditions were also analysed. The consistency between the two independent and complementary datasets ( h d,IGN and h d,AEMET ) was assessed throughout the eruption (mean difference of 258.6 m). Our results confirmed the existence of three distinct eruptive phases, encompassing a range of styles from Strombolian explosive to effusive activity. While these phases have been characterised in previous studies, the results of the present work provide complementary information and novel insights from an alternative observational approach, which may be of use in future volcanic crises and will be applied to operational surveillance during such events. A subsequent comparison of h d,AEMET with the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aerosol layer height product (ALH CALIOP ) revealed a systematic underestimation by the satellite product, with a mean difference of 392.2 m. Finally, the impact of using h ec in estimating SO 2 emissions from the NASA MSVOLSO2L4 satellite-based product was evaluated. When a fixed (standard) plume altitude of 8 km was used instead of the observed h ec , the total SO 2 emission was significantly underestimated by an average of 56.2 %, and by up to 84.7 %. These findings underscore the importance of accurately determining the volcanic plume height when deriving SO 2 emissions from satellite data.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.