Comparison of Surgically Induced Astigmatism Between Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant Surgery and Trabeculectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: This study aimed to compare surgically induced corneal astigmatism (SIA) between Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) surgery and trabeculectomy and to identify prognostic factors associated with SIA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 109 and 229 eyes that underwent BGI surgery and trabeculectomy, respectively, at Fukui University Hospital. Corneal astigmatism was assessed preoperatively, and at 6 months postoperatively, the mean SIA (M-SIA) and centroid SIA were calculated, and factors associated with M-SIA were determined. Results: BGI surgery was associated with greater SIA than trabeculectomy. Postoperative corneal astigmatism was −1.53 ± 1.01 D in the BGI group and −1.33 ± 0.92 D in the trabeculectomy group (p = 0.044). The M-SIA was significantly larger in the BGI group (1.41 ± 1.05 D vs. 0.94 ± 0.74 D, p < 0.01). Multivariate regression revealed that BGI surgery and lower preoperative corneal astigmatism were independently associated with greater M-SIA. Subgroup analysis revealed that older age and lower preoperative astigmatism were significant predictors of larger M-SIA in the BGI group, whereas only preoperative astigmatism was significant in the trabeculectomy group. Conclusions: BGI surgery was associated with greater and more variable SIA than trabeculectomy. Surgical type, baseline astigmatism, and age are important predictors of postoperative SIA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of Surgically Induced Astigmatism Between Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant Surgery and Trabeculectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 20/02/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.