Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Illicit opioid adulterant trends in patients presenting with acute opioid overdose

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
15Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Clandestine fentanyl manufacturing oftentimes introduces adulterants and contaminants. This article aims to evaluate trends in adulterants from a cohort of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with illicit opioid overdose across the United States. The Fentalog Study group is a multicenter toxicology study group which evaluated ED patients with suspected opioid overdose at 10 medical centers across the United States between 21 September 2020 through 5 February 2024. Comprehensive qualitative toxicology testing was performed on residual serum specimens. Study sites were divided into three geographic regions: West (California, Oregon, Colorado), Midwest (Missouri, Michigan), and East (New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia). Illicit opioids were defined as fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, heroin or its metabolites, and/or novel potent opioids such as nitazenes. 1295 patients with confirmed illicit opioid overdose were included. Males accounted for the majority (73.7%) of patients. The median age was 39 (IQR: 31-54) years. Adulterants were detected in 745 (57.5%) patients. Quinine was the most abundantly encountered adulterant (433; 33.4%). Antihistamines were the most frequently detected class of adulterants (19.6%). There were significant differences in adulterants detected across the three time periods, with notable decreases in adulterants from time-period 1 (79.5%) to time-period 3 (41.7%; P < .001). Adulterants were found in 84 (27.0%) of patients that presented to a hospital in the Western United States, compared with 181 (24.3%) in the Midwest, and 480 (64.4%) of patients in the East (P < .001). Patients with concurrent cocaine were more likely having an adulterant present than those without cocaine present (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.15-1.31). In contrast, patients with illicit opioids and concurrent methamphetamine were less likely to have adulterants present (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.84-0.95). Adulteration of illicit opioids was more likely in the Eastern United States and for those with concurrent cocaine and opioid exposures.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Illicit opioid adulterant trends in patients presenting with acute opioid overdose
Date Crossref
19/02/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPoisoning and overdose treatmentsForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.