Development of a standardized evaluation model for virtual reality-based emergency training: a Delphi study on competency criteria for interprofessional teams

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background Effective collaboration among healthcare professionals is essential for delivering high-quality patient care, especially in emergencies. As healthcare education adopts new technologies, virtual reality (VR) is gaining traction for enhancing emergency response skills. To define key learning objectives and best practices for a newly developed VR-based emergency training program in surgical wards, an interprofessional modified Delphi study was conducted. Methods A five-round modified Delphi method was conducted with 17 participants from medical and nursing backgrounds. Round 1 involved an interprofessional discussion to identify critical actions, common errors, and preliminary learning goals. In Round 2, participants interacted with the VR simulation and refined the objectives in a follow-up discussion. In Round 3, 157 statements were rated using a five-point Likert scale. Items lacking consensus (<80% agreement, IQR > 1, or median ≤4; n = 76) were discussed again in Round 4. Revised items were anonymously re-evaluated in Round 5. Results The Delphi process resulted in consensus on 131 of 157 items (84%), defining a structured framework of core interprofessional competencies, including key learning objectives, essential clinical actions, teamwork principles, and time-critical decision points for VR-based emergency training. No consensus was reached for 26 items (16%). Between Rounds 3 and 5, eight items showed differing ratings between physicians and nurses, which were reduced to four after interprofessional discussion. Conclusion This study resulted in a consensus-based framework of interprofessional learning objectives and key competencies for VR-based emergency training. It highlights the value of structured interprofessional collaboration in the systematic development of evaluation-oriented educational frameworks for ward-based surgical emergencies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.