The incidence of respiratory infections in patients undergoing major oral cavity and maxillary and mandibular resections with free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer
Rattachement africain : gb, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyse respiratory infection rates (RI) in a representative cohort and evaluate if tumour size, pre-existing respiratory co-morbidities, smoking history, and tracheostomy predicted postoperative infection. METHODS: A retrospective observational study at a London tertiary head and neck oncology centre reviewed six years of patient data. BMJ Best Practice guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia (2022) were applied to medical records alongside postoperative RI prescriptions. RESULTS: RI occurred in 32% of patients, more often in those with tracheostomy (36%) than intubation (12%). Infected patients were older (p=0.025), had tracheostomy (p=0.045), and underwent bilateral neck dissection (p<0.001). ICU (p=0.008) and hospital LOS (p<0.001) were significantly higher. Age, smoking, respiratory disease, tumour stage, and airway type were not predictors. CONCLUSION: RI were more frequent in tracheostomised patients, though assessed risk factors were not predictive. Further research should explore additional contributors and evaluate targeted interventions to reduce incidence.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The incidence of respiratory infections in patients undergoing major oral cavity and maxillary and mandibular resections with free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer
- Date Crossref
- 18/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.