Ethical considerations related to drone use for environment and health research: a scoping review
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Drones are increasingly used in environment and health research for data collection. Their unique capabilities, such as unrestricted aerial mobility and high-resolution imagery, can raise ethical concerns. This scoping review maps the literature on ethical considerations to inform responsible research practices. Five databases and grey literature were searched 1 June–27 July 2023 (n = 6426). An expert advisory workshop was held on 26 April 2024. Full-text records (n = 80) were analysed through four distinct lenses: (i) Research conduct, (ii) Research reflection, (iii) Community and (iv) Guidelines. Main findings reveal that: (i) Including qualitative components increases the level of community engagement. (ii) Ethical concerns and mitigation strategies were thematically grouped into: social impacts, privacy, regulatory, autonomy, beneficence, safety and technology (n = 16). (iii) Public support for drones is contingent on the purpose of data collection, with scientific use generally received positively. (iv) Ethical guidelines (n = 4) emphasize safety and technical compliance, with limited attention to community engagement. Ethical concerns around consent procedures, social impacts, institutional review board (IRB) classification, power dynamics, community benefits and drone use in high-conflict or complex legal settings remain underexplored in ethical guidance for researchers.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ethical considerations related to drone use for environment and health research: a scoping review
- Date Crossref
- 18/02/2026
- Éditeur
- The Royal Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.