A Data-Driven Method for Identifying Similarity in Transmission Sections Considering Energy Storage Regulation Capabilities

Le résumé fourni par la source

To address the challenges of real-time control in power systems with high renewable penetration, identifying historical transmission sections similar to future scenarios enables efficient reuse of mature control strategies. However, existing data-driven identification methods exhibit two primary limitations: they typically rely on static Total Transfer Capacity (TTC), ignoring the rapid regulation capability of Energy Storage Systems (ESS) in alleviating congestion; and they employ fixed weights for similarity measurement, failing to distinguish the varying importance of different features (e.g., critical line flows vs. ordinary voltages). To overcome these issues, this paper proposes a similarity identification method for transmission sections considering ESS regulation capabilities and adaptive feature weights. First, a hierarchical decision model is utilized to screen basic grid features. An optimization model incorporating ESS charge/discharge constraints and emergency power support potential is established to calculate the Dynamic TTC, constructing a multi-scale feature set that reflects the real-time safety margin of the grid. Second, a Dispersion-Weighted Fuzzy C-Means (DW-FCM) clustering algorithm is proposed. By introducing a dispersion-weighting mechanism, the algorithm utilizes data distribution characteristics to automatically learn and assign higher weights to key features with high distinguishability during the iteration process, overcoming the subjectivity of manual weighting. Furthermore, fuzzy validity indices (XB, PC, FS) are introduced to adaptively determine the optimal number of clusters. Finally, case studies on the IEEE 39-bus system verify that the proposed method significantly improves identification accuracy compared to traditional methods and provides more reliable references for dispatching decisions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.