Development and Characterization of Dissolving Microneedles for the Buccal Delivery of Cannabidiol (CBD)
Rattachement africain : gr, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study aimed to develop dissolving microneedles (MNs) for the buccal delivery of cannabidiol (CBD). CBD is a non-psychotomimetic phytocannabinoid with anti-inflammatory and anxiolytic properties. The MN arrays were produced using micromolding, which has the ability of scalability. However, this approach lacks the ability to customize needle geometry; thus, additive manufacturing was implemented in the study. Digital Light Processing (DLP) printing is a promising way to produce molds with customized MN architecture. In the present study, molds were fabricated from 3D-printed MN arrays to prepare dissolving MNs for buccal administration. Polymeric needles based on Eudragit L100-55 and Eudragit RSPO were produced from reverse molds and they were evaluated regarding their physiochemical and mechanical properties, followed by in vitro and ex vivo studies using porcine buccal mucosa. Visualization studies were conducted using confocal scanning laser microscopy, whereas the membrane integrity of the porcine mucosa upon application of the MNs was assessed by histological evaluation. Our results suggest that the needles can be effectively inserted into the buccal tissue and release the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in a controlled manner. This approach offers a patient-friendly alternative to oral CBD delivery, bypassing first-pass metabolism.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Development and Characterization of Dissolving Microneedles for the Buccal Delivery of Cannabidiol (CBD)
- Date Crossref
- 17/02/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.