Abstract RF3-05: Tissue-free circulating tumour DNA detection in patients with early triple negative breast cancer from the c-TRAK-TN trial
Rattachement africain : gb, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background: Detection of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in plasma predicts future recurrence in early breast cancer (EBC). Previous studies have relied on tumour-informed approaches with personalised assays. In this study, we performed orthogonal testing on plasma samples collected prospectively in the c-TRAK-TN study to compare a tissue-free assay with digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for ctDNA analysis. Methods: c-TRAK-TN recruited 161 patients with early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) deemed clinically high risk of relapse. Patients underwent ctDNA analysis by ddPCR starting within 4 weeks of completion of treatment and continuing every 3 months for up to 2 years. ddPCR tracked 1 or 2 patient specific variants as previously described. We further analysed 1062 timepoints from a total of 159 patients (median 7 per patient, range 1-11) using Guardant Reveal assay, a tissue-free approach that exploits differential methylation patterns in breast cancer compared with normal tissue. Results: Samples were successfully analysed from 95.3% (1012/1062) timepoints from 159 patients with the tissue-free Reveal assay. CtDNA was detected in 34.0% (54/159) of patients in at least 1 timepoint, with a median methylation tumour fraction of 0.266% (range 0.002 to 51.0%). Detection of ctDNA with the tumour agnostic assay strongly associated with future risk of relapse (HR 20.62, p<0.0001; logrank). Of patients who relapsed by 24 months follow up, 89.5% (34/38) of relapses were detected by prior ctDNA analysis. There were 159 patients available for comparison between ddPCR and the tissue-free assay (Reveal), in 1005 timepoints (median 7 per patient, range 1-11). Concordant test results were observed in 950/1005 timepoints with an overall agreement rate of 94.5%. In this cohort, 63.5% (101/159) of patients did not have ctDNA detected by either assay; 26.4% (42/159) had ctDNA detected by both assays and 10.1% (16/159) had discordant results. Of those detected, 44.8% (26/58) were detected by the tissue-free assay first and 6.9% (4/58) by ddPCR (p<0.0001, Fisher exact test). The median time from first detection of ctDNA to relapse for the tissue-free assay was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.7-10.5 months) compared to ddPCR assay with 5.7 months (95% CI: 2.9-9.7 months) (HR = 0.6, p=0.0574; mixed effects cox model). Conclusion: Detection of ctDNA with a tissue-free assay anticipated relapse with high accuracy, in patients with early TNBC. The tissue-free assay frequently detected ctDNA at an earlier timepoint than ddPCR, trending towards a longer lead time from detection of ctDNA to relapse. Tissue-free approaches might offer simpler workflows for ctDNA analysis than tumour-informed approaches, and further assessment in clinical trials is warranted. Citation Format: N. Cunningham, R. J. Cutts, C. Swift, K. Dunne, M. Dewan, L. Kilburn, K. Goddard, P. Hall, C. Harper-Wynne, T. Hickish, I. Macpherson, A. Okines, A. Wardley, S. Waters, C. Palmieri, M. Winter, J. Bliss, D. Dustin, M. Ellis, I. Garcia- Murillas, N. C. Turner. Tissue-free circulating tumour DNA detection in patients with early triple negative breast cancer from the c-TRAK-TN trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF3-05.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Abstract RF3-05: Tissue-free circulating tumour DNA detection in patients with early triple negative breast cancer from the c-TRAK-TN trial
- Date Crossref
- 17/02/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.