Abstract PS1-12-08: Real-world ESR1 mutation (ESR1m) testing and positivity rates in patients with ER+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
Rattachement africain : us, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background: As the MBC treatment landscape evolves, understanding ESR1m testing patterns for ER+, HER2- MBC is essential to identify patients for targeted therapies. Despite existing guidelines recommending testing of patients with MBC at progression for ESR1m, real-world data on testing and mutation rates are limited. Therefore, we described ESR1m testing and positivity (+) rates in patients with ER+, HER2- MBC to identify opportunities for improved ESR1m test utilization. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included patients aged ≥18 years at ER+, HER2- MBC diagnosis (Dx) who initiated 1st line (1L) therapy with aromatase inhibitors (AI) or selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) ± CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) from 1/1/20-3/31/25. Flatiron Health Research Database (FHRD), a de-identified US-based electronic health record database, was used to estimate ESR1m+ rates in windows defined as: A) initial early breast cancer (EBC) Dx date or 90 days before de novo MBC Dx to last patient contact, B) MBC Dx date to 1L initiation date+28 days, C) during line of therapy (LoT;start to end date), and D) at LoT initiation (90 days before to 28 days after LoT initiation). Results: Of all 12148 patients, 48% (n=5874) had ≥1 ESR1m test and most tested patients (n=3650/5874; 62%) were tested only once (mean:1.6 test/patient). Among all patients, testing rates were similar at each LoT initiation (25-29%). In exploratory analyses of all patients, post-2023 testing rates were often higher than pre-2023, especially at 1L (34 vs 20%) and 2L initiation (36 vs 26%). When considering patients with data available on ESR1m testing by sample type (n=2028), ∼60% were in tissue only and ∼40% were in blood only. Among a subgroup of patients with de novo MBC who received 1L AI±CDK4/6i, testing rates at 2L and 3L initiation were 27-28%. For the subgroup of patients with EBC who relapsed and developed MBC while on adjuvant AI±CDK4/6i or ≤12 months after completion, the testing rate was the highest during 1L (38%). Among all patients, ESR1m+ was 15% during 1L and increased to 37% at 3L initiation. Among patients with de novo MBC (received 1L AI±CDK4/6i), ESR1m+ was highest at 3L initiation (40%). Among the relapsed patients, ESR1m+ was 23% at 1L initiation, 31% at 2L initiation, and 33% at 3L initiation. Conclusion: Among all patients with MBC, 52% were never tested and only 34-36% were tested at 1L and 2L initiation from 2023 onward. Importantly, lower rates of ESR1m+ were observed in the real-world compared to clinical trials. This may be due to suboptimal test timing, poor patient identification for testing, and frequent use of tissue-based testing, which is less sensitive than the recommended blood-based ctDNA used in clinical trials. These results highlight an unmet need for increased ESR1m testing using blood-based ctDNA to optimize patient identification for targeted therapies in ER+, HER2- MBC. Citation Format: C. Liao, N. Bansal, J. John, M. Bhave, F. Bidard, T. Marquart, A. Chawla, L. Williams. Real-world ESR1 mutation (ESR1m) testing and positivity rates in patients with ER+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-12-08.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Abstract PS1-12-08: Real-world ESR1 mutation (ESR1m) testing and positivity rates in patients with ER+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
- Date Crossref
- 17/02/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.