Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric Heart Transplantation: A 36-Year Single-Center Experience

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

All articles of this category (opens in new window) Background: Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for pediatric patients, its use remains complex and is associated with significant perioperative and postoperative challenges, particularly in critically ill individuals. We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare outcomes between patients who received MCS prior to heart transplantation (HTx) and those who did not. Methods: We reviewed records of all pediatric patients who underwent HTx at our center between 1988 and 2024. Comparative analyses were performed between patients with pre-HTx MCS and MCS-naïve patients, including baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival. Results: Of 278 pediatric heart transplants performed, 38 (14%) recipients had pre-HTx MCS. MCS patients were significantly older, with 87% being older than 1 year at the time of transplant. Cardiomyopathy was more common among MCS patients compared with congenital heart disease (76% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). Waitlist times did not differ significantly between groups. During transplantation, median cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer in the MCS group (300 vs. 252 minutes, p = 0.05). Postoperatively, 30-day mortality was comparable between groups. However, postoperative hemodialysis was significantly more frequent in MCS patients (29% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.040). Long-term survival was similar, with 20-year Kaplan–Meier estimates of 70.0% for MCS patients and 70.2% for MCS-naïve patients ( p = 0.67). Conclusion: Pretransplant MCS is associated with longer operative times and a higher incidence of postoperative hemodialysis, but does not adversely affect early or long-term survival following heart transplantation. These findings support the safe and effective use of MCS as a bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients. Publication History Article published online: 17 February 2026 © 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric Heart Transplantation: A 36-Year Single-Center Experience
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Mechanical Circulatory Support DevicesTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesCongenital Heart Disease Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.