Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Concordance of Death Information Between Two Health Systems Serving the Same Region and the Social Security Administration Death Master File: Retrospective Observational Study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: There are multiple sources that document the date of a person's death in the United States. Unfortunately, this seemingly simple information is either incomplete or costly to obtain. Nevertheless, information on such events is critical for both health systems and clinical studies to assess the outcomes of operational and therapeutic interventions. Objective: As part of a larger assessment of the quality of multisource death information, we compared the death data from two health systems serving the same region and the Social Security Administration Death Master File (SSADMF). Methods: This study linked death records for patients seen in either health system with the SSADMF from 2007 to 2020 to identify concordant and discordant death data among sources. Analyses included cross-system matching, classification of death records by overlap, and calculation of agreement using the Fleiss κ. Results: Among 904,581 matched patients, only 209 (0.02%) deaths were confirmed by all 3 sources. Large proportions of deaths were uniquely recorded by a single source: 54.32% (10,697/19,691) by health system A, 5.16% (1017/19,691) by health system B, and 20.17% (3972/19,691) by the SSADMF. The Fleiss κ was negative (-0.312), reflecting less agreement than expected by chance. Conclusions: While this study is not generalizable, it showed that, without processes in place to obtain external data regarding patient deaths, health care facility death information should not be relied upon as a complete list of those who have died. The discordances observed highlight the potential for significant gaps in death reporting within health care systems, which could impact the accuracy of mortality-based analyses and quality assessments.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Concordance of Death Information Between Two Health Systems Serving the Same Region and the Social Security Administration Death Master File: Retrospective Observational Study
Date Crossref
07/04/2026
Éditeur
JMIR Publications Inc.
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.