Non-invasive stroke volume assessment during cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides additional insight beyond O2-pulse in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is considered the gold standard for assessing exercise tolerance, with O2-pulse commonly used as a surrogate for stroke volume (SV). However, because SV reduction can be masked by increased oxygen extraction, direct non-invasive measurement of SV is valuable. This study involved 102 HCM patients (mean age 53 ± 16 years, 78% male), predominantly with a non-obstructive phenotype (74%), who underwent CPET with SV measurement using Physioflow (PF). Abnormal O2-pulse kinetics were observed in 12 patients, all confirmed by abnormal SV trends with PF. Additionally, PF identified another 28 patients with altered SV kinetics. Abnormal SV trends were associated with higher peak VE/VO2 ratios (42.6 [37.4–47.5] vs. 38.0 [33.6–41.3]) and lower end-tidal CO2 values (31.8 ± 4.9 vs. 34.3 ± 5.6 mmHg, p < 0.05). Patients with greater SV growth during the final 25% of exercise showed improved anaerobic threshold VO2 (49.8 ± 12.3% vs. 43.9 ± 15.2% predicted peak VO2), VO2/work slope (10.2 ± 2.0 vs. 9.3 ± 1.3 mL/min/Watt), and peak PetCO2 (34.5 ± 5.6 vs. 32.3 ± 5.2 mmHg), alongside a lower VE/VCO2 slope (28.7 [24.9–31.0] vs. 31.3 [27.3–34.2], p < 0.05). Integrating PF and CPET may enhance the detection of abnormal SV kinetics, which are associated with reduced functional capacity in HCM patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Non-invasive stroke volume assessment during cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides additional insight beyond O2-pulse in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Date Crossref
- 17/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.