Effects of Fibrinogen Levels on Thromboelastography-Derived Clot Strength in Pregnant Women With or Without Immune Thrombocytopenia

Résumé fourni par la source

ObjectivesPlatelet-fibrin interactions are critical for hemostasis. Thromboelastography (TEG) assesses these dynamics globally. We investigated the role of fibrinogen on TEG-derived clot strength in pregnant women with and without thrombocytopenia, integrating transcriptomic analysis of public datasets to molecularly corroborate our functional findings.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 140 third-trimester pregnancies (70 with normal platelet counts and 70 with thrombocytopenia) enrolled between 2015 and 2020. TEG parameters, platelet indices, and fibrinogen concentrations were analyzed. In parallel, public transcriptomic datasets were reanalyzed to explore coagulation- and fibrinogen-related pathways during pregnancy.ResultsMean platelet volume (MPV), platelet count, fibrinogen, and TEG parameters [R-time, K-time, alpha angle, and maximum amplitude (MA)] differed significantly between groups (p < .05). MA positively correlated with platelet count (r = 0.873, p < .001) and fibrinogen concentration (r = 0.410, p < .01). In thrombocytopenic women, MA correlated with platelet count (r = 0.736, p < .0001), MPV (r = 0.447, p < .01), and fibrinogen (r = 0.361, p < .01). Multivariate regression confirmed platelet count and fibrinogen as independent predictors of MA (p < .05). Transcriptomic analysis further demonstrated upregulation of fibrinogen subunits (FGB, F13A1) and enrichment of coagulation pathways in pregnancy, consistent with the functional TEG findings.ConclusionsElevated fibrinogen is associated with and may compensate for preserved clot strength in late pregnancy, particularly in thrombocytopenia. Our integrative analysis provides functional and molecular insights into a potential compensatory mechanism, which forms a rationale for future research to evaluate the therapeutic utility of fibrinogen supplementation. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant prospective interventional validation before clinical application.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.