15 years of longitudinal genetic, clinical, cognitive, imaging, and biochemical measures in DIAN
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Observational Study (DIAN Obs) is a longitudinal, global cohort study investigating brain aging and autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease (ADAD), a rare monogenic form of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Established in 2008 with support from the National Institute on Aging (NIA), DIAN Obs is designed to collect comprehensive and uniform data with the aim to characterize brain biology and clinical trajectory of individuals at risk for ADAD. Mutations in the amyloid protein precursor ( APP ), presenilin 1 ( PSEN1 ), or presenilin 2 ( PSEN2 ) genes cause ADAD with virtually full penetrance and a predictable age at symptomatic onset. Participants, both mutation carriers and non-carriers from affected families, undergo longitudinal clinical and cognitive assessments, neurologic and physical examinations, structural and functional neuro-imaging, and amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET). Biospecimens include cerebrospinal fluid, plasma, serum, and whole blood for biochemical, genetic and multi-omic analyses, with brain donation upon death. This dataset enables one of the most detailed longitudinal examinations of the human brain across the continuum from presymptomatic to symptomatic AD. The extensive DIAN Obs data and biospecimen repository provides a globally accessible resource to advance understanding of AD pathophysiology, aging, and the development of preventive and therapeutic interventions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- 15 years of longitudinal genetic, clinical, cognitive, imaging, and biochemical measures in DIAN
- Date Crossref
- 16/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.