Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in orthodontic tooth movement and pain perception in human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been proposed as a non-invasive adjunct to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and reduce treatment-related pain, but findings remain inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate its clinical effectiveness. METHOD: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, covering all records available up to May 25, 2025. Eligible human studies were assessed for risk of bias and data were systematically extracted. All included studies were synthesized qualitatively, while pain outcomes at 24 h from four studies were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: = 93%). However, individual trials reported variable short-term analgesic effects. Evidence for OTM acceleration was mixed, ranging from substantial acceleration to negligible effect. Considerable heterogeneity in study design, intervention protocols and outcome definitions limited comparability. CONCLUSION: LIPUS may represent a promising non-invasive adjunct in orthodontics, yet current evidence remains insufficient to support its routine clinical use for either pain management or tooth movement acceleration. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized application protocols and consistent outcome measures are needed to clarify its effectiveness. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD 420,251,069,418.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in orthodontic tooth movement and pain perception in human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 16/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.