The Thymus Regeneration Paradox: The Search for Stemness in an Involuting Organ
Rattachement africain : gb, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The thymus is emerging as a model for studying organ regeneration and stem cell biology. While research has long focused on how antigen-presenting cells shape the T cell repertoire, recent discoveries unveil a far richer cellular landscape that challenges long-held views of thymus structure and function. This review traces the history of early thymic reconstitution assays, the paradigm of clonal stem cells and serial transplantation, assessing evidence for "stemness" within the thymus. A key focus is the paradox that an involuting thymus retains cells able to expand in culture and reconstitute organ function. We differentiate embryonic/fetal thymus development from postnatal homeostasis, emphasizing how the potency of epithelial progenitor/stem cells shifts with age or upon injury. The role of mesenchymal/interstitial cells and the extracellular milieu is considered alongside advances in organ reconstruction. We outline major unsolved questions in the field: thymus regeneration after childhood; the minimal components required to generate functional naïve T cells outside the body; and the potential of next-generation humanized mouse models to interrogate immune tolerance and novel immunotherapies. We argue that thymus research is entering a new era, one in which understanding and harnessing thymus regenerative potential could yield transformative advances in both basic science and clinical applications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Thymus Regeneration Paradox: The Search for Stemness in an Involuting Organ
- Date Crossref
- 15/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.