Distinct tau filament folds in familial frontotemporal dementia due to the MAPT S305I mutation
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions (FTLD-tau) comprise a class of fatal heterogeneous neurodegenerative diseases. Approximately 10% arise from pathogenic MAPT mutations and often cause severe, early-onset disease with pathology that is distinct yet partially overlapping with sporadic cases. Here, we evaluated post-mortem tissue from a patient with FTLD-tau due to MAPT S305I showing neuropathology most consistent with argyrophilic grain disease (AGD), a prevalent limbic tauopathy of aging. Structures determined by cryo-electron microscopy reveal tau filament folds that differ from those found in sporadic AGD or other tauopathies and feature a 4-layer architecture stabilized by the Ile substitution within its core. Comparative structural analysis reveals conserved motifs are shared among AGD, corticobasal degeneration, and MAPT P301T. A well-defined density stacks along a cationic cleft, indicative of a bound RNA-like polyanion or small-molecule. In vitro analysis shows the S305I mutation promotes fibrilization relative to normal tau. These results demonstrate that MAPT S305I stabilizes a distinct aggregation-prone tau fold that likely contributes to disease pathology and heterogeneity beyond its known splicing defects, and underscore potential limitations of using the most pathologically similar genetic form as a model for sporadic FTLD-tau.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Distinct tau filament folds in familial frontotemporal dementia due to the <i>MAPT</i> S305I mutation
- Date Crossref
- 14/02/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.