Evolution of oncogene amplification across 86,000 cancer cell genomes

Le résumé fourni par la source

High-level copy-number (CN) amplification (HLAMP) is a major mechanism of oncogene activation in human cancer. Despite progress in therapeutically targeting amplified oncogenes, the processes underlying amplicon evolution remain incompletely understood, leaving critical knowledge gaps in their etiology and mechanisms of therapeutic response. To address this, we analyzed the evolutionary trajectories of HLAMPs using single-cell whole-genome sequencing data from 86,239 cancer cells across 93 patients and 9 experimental systems. We found that cell-to-cell CN variability provides a quantifiable readout of HLAMP mechanism, clearly distinguishing extrachromosomal circular DNA (ecDNA) from intrachromosomal amplification (ICamp) through characteristic CN distributions that reflect distinct modes of segregation and correspond to clonal architecture. Notably, ICamp events frequently showed multiple amplitude peaks specific to subclones, indicating punctuated shifts in oncogene dosage through numeric or structural modulatory mechanisms with transcriptional impact. In contrast, ecDNAs exhibited broad, continuous CN distribution with extreme high-copy outliers, consistent with asymmetric segregation. The CN and structural diversity of ecDNA regions enabled systematic deconvolution of ecDNA subspecies and estimation of their per-cell abundance, revealing the history of ecDNA-mediated oncogenesis at single-nucleotide resolution. We observed ecDNA diversification through internal rearrangements across cases and, notably, convergent evolution in glioblastoma cases marked by multiple, recurrent acquisition of EGFR-targeting ecDNAs. Finally, single-cell genome-based identification of ecDNAs showed substantial discrepancy with bulk genome graph-based predictions and reliably distinguished actively maintained ecDNAs from historical genomic footprints after chromosomal re-integration. These findings reveal marked tissue-type specificity of ecDNAs, suggesting that ecDNA-mediated oncogenesis may depend on a permissive tissue context.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.