Comparing Minimally Invasive Puncture Under Local Anesthesia to Open Laparotomy Under General Anesthesia for Establishing a Rabbit VX2 Liver Tumor Model
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: To compare ultrasound-guided percutaneous puncture under local anesthesia (LA) versus open laparotomy under general anesthesia (GA) for establishing a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model, evaluating efficacy, safety, animal welfare, and tumor biology. Methods: Twenty-eight rabbits were randomly assigned to Group A (ultrasound-guided percutaneous under LA, n = 14) or Group B (open surgery under GA, n = 14). Parameters compared included anesthesia and operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical trauma, postoperative complications, mortality, tumor implantation success rate, tumor volume, and tumor characteristics were evaluated via imaging and histopathological analysis. Results: Compared to Group B, Group A demonstrated significantly shorter anesthesia preparation time (61.00 ± 6.70 s vs 632.60 ± 67.84 s, P < 0.0001) and operation time (4.99 ± 0.65 min vs 28.57 ± 5.35 min, P < 0.0001), alongside significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (0.75 ± 0.26 mL vs 3.96 ± 0.77 mL, P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found in tumor implantation success rate (92.9% vs 85.7%) or tumor volume between the groups. However, Group A showed significantly lower rates of peritoneal seeding (7.1% vs 42.9%, P = 0.037) and abdominal wall invasion (0% vs 35.7%, P = 0.045). Group A also exhibited favorable trends in postoperative infection and mortality rates. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous puncture under LA is a superior method for creating the VX2 liver model. It is faster, less invasive, reduces bleeding and tumor dissemination risk, maintains equivalent tumorigenicity, and better adheres to animal welfare principles. Keywords: VX2 liver tumor model, minimally invasive puncture, local anesthesia, open laparotomy, comparative study
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparing Minimally Invasive Puncture Under Local Anesthesia to Open Laparotomy Under General Anesthesia for Establishing a Rabbit VX2 Liver Tumor Model
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.