Alimentary Tract Anatomy and Morphology in Early Adult Mediterranean Killifish Aphanius fasciatus (Valenciennes, 1821)
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background/Aims: The Mediterranean killifish, Aphanius fasciatus (Valenciennes, 1821), is a small euryhaline and eurytherm cyprinodont. While its ecology and role as a bioindicator are well known, its anatomy remains poorly understood. This study aimed to provide the first detailed description of the digestive tract of A. fasciatus, from the oropharyngeal cavity to the rectum. Methods: An anatomical and morphological approach supported by light microscopy was applied to examine oral, pharyngeal, and intestinal structures in adult specimens. Results: The jaws bear tricuspids incisiform teeth, whereas the pharynx has caniniform teeth. The tongue forms a muscular thickening of the oral floor and aids swallowing. The oropharyngeal tract and esophagus lead to a dilated anterior intestinal region resembling a primitive stomach, with mucosal folds and mucus-secreting epithelium, but lacking gastric glands. This chamber functions mainly for food storage, absorption, and preparation rather than true gastric digestion. The intestine extends to the rectum, showing sexual dimorphism: females have a relaxed anus, males a more toned and folded structure. Conclusions: These findings provide essential baseline information for comparison with other experimental models and reinforce the suitability of A. fasciatus as a reliable model for anatomical and functional studies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Alimentary Tract Anatomy and Morphology in Early Adult Mediterranean Killifish Aphanius fasciatus (Valenciennes, 1821)
- Date Crossref
- 12/02/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.