Psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 and clinical correlates of quality of life among Albanian men with prostate cancer
Résumé fourni par la source
Our aim was to assess the psychometric properties of the “EORTC QLQ-PR25” in Albania and to determine the links between disease characteristics and treatment in men with prostate cancer. A study conducted in Tirana during April 2024–December 2025 included 74 consecutive men diagnosed with prostate cancer who completed the EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaire (response: ≈94%). The EORTC QLQ-PR25 demonstrated excellent internal consistency across all subscales (Cronbach’s alpha range: 0.85-0.91), with very high reliability for the overall scale (α=0.94). Higher symptom burden and poorer overall quality-of-life were significantly associated with radical prostatectomy, metastatic disease, high Gleason score (9-10), and extracapsular tumour spread (all P<0.05). Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy reported the worst outcomes across all symptom domains, as well as the lowest general quality-of-life and health status scores. Seemingly, the EORTC QLQ-PR25 is a reliable and clinically valid instrument for assessing prostate cancer-specific quality-of-life among Albanian men. Also, symptom burden and quality-of-life impairment were strongly associated with disease severity and invasive treatment. Our findings support the integration of patient-reported outcomes into routine prostate cancer care in Albanian-speaking countries.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 and clinical correlates of quality of life among Albanian men with prostate cancer
- Date Crossref
- 12/02/2026
- Éditeur
- PAGEPress Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.