Long-term MAPK inhibition of childhood refractory-Langerhans cell histiocytosis: an observational study of 288 patients

Le résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT: We evaluated long-term outcomes of 288 children with refractory-Langerhans cell histiocytosis (R-LCH) from 26 countries, who were prescribed off-label MAPK inhibitors (MAPKis) according to clinical indications. MAPKi indications included 148 R-risk-organ-positive (R-RO+), 67 R-risk-organ-negative (R-RO-), 13 lung destruction (lung), 9 sclerosing cholangitis (SC), 49 neurodegeneration (ND), and 2 diabetes insipidus (DI) cases. Median ages at diagnosis and MAPKi onset were 1.3 and 2.3 years, respectively, with median follow-up of 3.7 years (1166 person-years). Agents mostly prescribed as monotherapies were 184 prescriptions of vemurafenib, 115 of dabrafenib, 3 of encorafenib, 42 of cobimetinib, 45 of trametinib, and/or 1 prescription of binimetinib; followed 51 times by various chemotherapies or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, or 28 times by combined anti-BRAF-anti-MEK. Short-term responses (<8 weeks) ranged from 98% (R-RO+ and R-RO-), to 30% (lung) to none (ND, DI, and SC); although long-term lung and ND responses could be observed. Skin rash was the most frequent adverse event (∼55%), and 7 others included 1 case of cardiomyopathy and 6 of retinitis. Five developed MAPKi-unrelated tumors and 9 patients died. Five-year survival was 98%. After 113 patients with R-LCH discontinued MAPKi, 69 experienced disease reactivation. None of the various empirical maintenance therapies were able to prevent secondary reactivation. Among the 143 assessable patients without ND-LCH at MAPKi onset, 60 developed ND (45%, 5-year risk). MAPKis appeared to be safe and effective in children with R-RO+/RO-LCH, whereas other indications' responses were less frequent or occurred later. Further studies are needed to find effective maintenance-therapy approaches, particularly to prevent frequently observed secondary ND.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.