Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

First-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab in advanced merkel cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of prospective trials and real-world validation cohort

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has a high response rate to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). While early phase studies have demonstrated activity of dual ICB with anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 agents in both the first- and second-line settings, the role of combination therapy as a first-line approach remains controversial. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence of first-line ICB therapy in MCC and to compare the pooled objective response rate (ORR) between combination ICB and monotherapy. Pooled ORRs were estimated using fixed-effects meta-analyses, and these results were statistically compared between combination ICB and monotherapy. In addition to the meta-analysis and as real-world validation, we performed a retrospective chart review of MCC patients treated with first-line combination ICB at a single referral center. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis, the pooled ORR of ipilimumab plus nivolumab was significantly higher than that of either anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy when considering all anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents (81.0% vs. 49.6%, p = 0.0001) as well as monotherapy when restricted to anti-PD-1 agents (81.0% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.0043). Concordant with pooled trial findings, we identified eight patients treated off protocol with first-line combination ICB at our institution, with seven (87.5%) achieving objective response. DISCUSSION: Based on meta-analysis of clinical trial data, first-line treatment of advanced Merkel cell carcinoma with ipilimumab plus nivolumab results in a higher objective response rate compared to monotherapy. The clinical decision to select combination therapy over monotherapy must weigh this response rate benefit with the unknown survival benefit and higher toxicity.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
First-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab in advanced merkel cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of prospective trials and real-world validation cohort
Date Crossref
12/02/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Polyomavirus and related diseasesViral-associated cancers and disordersLung Cancer Research Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.