Recommendations in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Post Resuscitation Care Via An International, Modified Delphi Approach
Rattachement africain : au, de, us, gb, kr, cn, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The global adoption of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for cardiac arrest is accelerating, reflecting its potential to improve outcomes in select patient populations. Although research has increasingly focused on patient selection criteria, there remains a critical lack of evidence to guide best practices in post-ECPR resuscitation management. This study aimed to identify key knowledge gaps and develop consensus-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the post-ECPR setting. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary steering committee comprising 11 ECPR experts and 1 survivor conducted a targeted literature review to identify key domains and gaps in post-ECPR care. Experts were recruited based on field impact and snowball sampling. A modified Delphi process was used, comprising 3 survey rounds. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement or disagreement on Likert-scale statements. RESULTS: A total of 53 experts were recruited, representing diverse health care professions, gender, and levels of clinical experience. Of these, 52 (98%) completed all 3 rounds of the Delphi process. Consensus was reached on 126 individual statements, which were synthesized into 42 summary position statements. These recommendations span key domains of post-ECPR care, including system-level considerations, hemodynamic targets and management strategies, ventilation and oxygenation protocols, anticoagulation practices, temperature regulation, complication mitigation, weaning approaches, and neuroprognostication. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi study, informed by a diverse international panel, resulted in 42 consensus-based position statements addressing key aspects of post-ECPR care. In the absence of robust empirical evidence, these expert-derived recommendations offer a valuable framework to support clinical decision-making and the development of standardized post-ECPR resuscitation protocols. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06552312.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Recommendations in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Post Resuscitation Care Via An International, Modified Delphi Approach
- Date Crossref
- 17/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
The University of Sydney pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Freiburg pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University Medical Center Freiburg pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Critical Care Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Minnesota Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Resuscitation Council pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Korea University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Westmead Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Tuen Mun Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital et University of Freiburg, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.