Ibrutinib with Venetoclax in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Phase II Study
Rattachement africain : us, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We explored the efficacy of the combination of ibrutinib + venetoclax in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This phase II study enrolled 80 patients between July 2016 and September 2018. Patients received ibrutinib for the first 3 cycles, followed by ibrutinib + venetoclax for 24 cycles. Of the 79 treated patients, the median age was 61 years (IQR, 56-69); 65 (65/76, 86%) had unmutated IGHV and 29 (37%) had either del(17p) or a TP53 mutation. The median number of prior treatments was 1 (range, 1-3). The primary endpoint, best complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), was 67%, with a bone marrow undetectable measurable residual disease [10-4 sensitivity (U-MRD4)] rate of 61%. At 95.5 months of median follow-up, the estimated 7-year progression-free survival rate was 63.3%. Grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 38% and 13% of patients, respectively. The 24-cycle ibrutinib + venetoclax combination led to high rates of CR/CRi and bone marrow U-MRD4 in patients with R/R CLL. SIGNIFICANCE: The 24-cycle ibrutinib + venetoclax combination led to high rates of CR/CRi and bone marrow U-MRD4 in patients with R/R CLL. Responses were durable, including in patients with high-risk genomics.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ibrutinib with Venetoclax in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Phase II Study
- Date Crossref
- 12/02/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.