IGSF3 binds to TNFR2 on Treg to facilitate immunosuppression in cervical cancer
Résumé fourni par la source
The clinical success of immune checkpoint blockades has revolutionized oncology; however, their efficacy in cervical cancer remains limited, primarily due to intricate tumor immune evasion mechanisms. Here, we identify elevated IGSF3 expression on tumor cells as a key driver enhancing regulatory T cell (Treg) infiltration and function. Crucially, we reveal a previously unrecognized ligand-receptor pair: IGSF3 on cervical cancer cells binds to TNFR2 on Tregs, activating NF-κB pathway and thereby amplifying Treg-mediated immunosuppression. Through structure-based virtual screening and rigorous multi-level validation, we developed purpurogallin, a conventionally recognized antioxidant compound, as a novel IGSF3 inhibitor, which effectively disrupts the IGSF3-TNFR2 interaction, reduces Treg abundance, suppresses tumor growth, and synergizes with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. Notably, pretreatment with purpurogallin followed by PD-1 blockade yields superior therapeutic efficacy compared to concurrent combination therapy. This study establishes IGSF3 as a pivotal regulator of the immunosuppressive microenvironment and unveils a promising sequential immunotherapy strategy for cervical cancer. • IGSF3 highly expressed on cancer cells promotes immunosuppression of Treg. • IGSF3 interacts with TNFR2 on Tregs thus activating NF-κB pathway. • Purpurogallin interrupts IGSF3-TNFR2 axis. • Purpurogallin enhances tumor control and sensitizes tumor to ICBs. • Purpurogallin can serve as a pretreatment to leverage anti-PD1 efficacy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- IGSF3 binds to TNFR2 on Treg to facilitate immunosuppression in cervical cancer
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.