Aller au contenu principal
2026 preprint

“You’ll never account for every client scenario” Perceived Facilitators and Barriers of a Co-designed Financial Incentive Intervention for Smoking Cessation in Ireland: A Qualitative Investigation

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Financial incentive interventions for promoting smoking cessation are effective, yet, as a complex intervention, exploring facilitators and barriers to any potential programme is vital to underpin appropriate implementation. We aimed to examine perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing a co-designed pilot financial incentive intervention for smoking cessation, targeting disadvantaged communities in Ireland. Methods: Three audio-recorded co-design workshops were held in communities that are nationally recognised as disadvantaged. As part of a larger mixed-methods study that used a nominal group technique to co-design a pilot financial incentive intervention for smoking cessation, we used a qualitative approach to specifically examine the potential facilitators and barriers to implementation. Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework, themes were developed, categorising these through both inductive thematic and deductive analysis using NVivo 15. Results: Themes were developed to categorise perceived facilitators and barriers. Perceived facilitators included: establishing clear intervention guidelines, implementation training for staff, fair distribution of tasks, face-to-face consultations for rapport-building, incentives for smoking cessation being more defendable when appropriately targeted, minimal intervention promotion to reduce public backlash. Perceived barriers included: an inability to account for all potential intervention challenges, disruption to work dynamics if training needs are not planned for, increased workload among staff, concerns about introducing biological-testing, concerns that some clients will game the intervention, public disapproval, limited technological resources, incurred travel expenses. Conclusion: Potential facilitators and barriers of the co-designed intervention were identified prior to commencement, informing subsequent strategy for design and implementation. Key words: Financial Incentives, Smoking, Intervention, Barriers, Facilitators

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les sujets associés

Health Policy Implementation ScienceMental Health and Patient InvolvementSmoking Behavior and Cessation

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.