Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Clinical outcome comparison of suture button suspensionplasty versus trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition in patients with carpometacarpal joint arthritis: a systematic review of direct comparison studies

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : id. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Trapeziectomy nowadays is predominantly done with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition (LRTI) or Suture Button Suspensionplasty (SBS). This article is intended to highlight comparison between SBS and trapeziectomy with LRTI through direct comparison evidence. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The LRTI technique involves the removal of the diseased trapezium bone and creating suspension through the use of flexor carpi radialis tendon, while SBS stabilize the metacarpal base by suspending the first metacarpal bone. The record screening process of this systematic and meta-analysis was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. QuickDASH, post-operative strength, visual analog scale were set as the primary outcomes, while the adverse event reported and miscellaneous findings worth mentioning per study were set as the secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 102 records screened, 1 Randomized Control Trial (RCTs) and 1 Cohorts, consisting of 188 cases were included in the analysis. Both modalities showed comparable, non-significant difference in efficacy (alleviating pain associated with basal joint arthritis, improving strength and function of the affected thumb, in the long term) at the endpoint of the follow-up. Both procedures also showcased excellent safety and long-term functional profile. However, SBS displayed an advantage in post-operative recovery aspect as well as the biomechanical aspect compared to LRTI. Conclusions: Both LRTI & SBS demonstrated non-inferiority to each other, hence clinical judgment might be more based on the preference and tolerability of the patient, as well as the experience of the center. Further prospective, comparative study might be needed to truly erect the superiority of one of the procedures to another.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Clinical outcome comparison of suture button suspensionplasty versus trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition in patients with carpometacarpal joint arthritis: a systematic review of direct comparison studies
Date Crossref
11/02/2026
Éditeur
MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Orthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationPeripheral Nerve DisordersFoot and Ankle Surgery

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.