Measuring Dynamic Tendon Torsion Using Ultrasound Speckle Tracking: Validation with Silicone Phantom and In Vivo Application on Human Tibialis Posterior Tendon
Rattachement africain : tw, hk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The torsional characteristics of human tendons are recognized to have functional and clinical relevance, but are underexplored due to the limited in vivo assessment methods available to measure the dynamic torsion characteristics of a tendon during movement. This study aimed to validate the use of transverse plane ultrasound speckle tracking (ST) for measuring dynamic torsion on silicone phantoms, and to evaluate the capability and reliability of ST in measuring dynamic torsion of the human tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) in vivo. Of the ten silicone phantoms tested in the validation study, ST measurement results strongly correlated with the referencing marker tracking method (R2 = 0.81–0.95) and had measurement error similar to or smaller than the hypothesized accuracy of 3° (p > 0.045). Subsequently, when ST was applied to nineteen healthy participants’ TPT in vivo, it was capable of characterizing the dynamic external torsion of the TPT during 0–20° passive foot pronation. Strong correlations were found between the ST-measured angle and the foot pronation angle (R2 = 0.98–0.99), and the test–retest reliability was moderate to good (ICC = 0.73–0.87). These findings suggested that ST is a valid and reliable method for measuring dynamic tendon torsion characteristics.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Measuring Dynamic Tendon Torsion Using Ultrasound Speckle Tracking: Validation with Silicone Phantom and In Vivo Application on Human Tibialis Posterior Tendon
- Date Crossref
- 11/02/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.