In the Shadow of Judgment: Mapping Out the Landscape of Human-AI Decision-Making Through a Systematic Review

Le résumé fourni par la source

Research on human–AI decision-making (HAID) has grown rapidly across domains. However, the literature on this topic remains fragmented, and conceptual ambiguities hinder systematic synthesis and cross-domain comparison. We present a systematic review of HAID publications from 2016 to 2024. Starting with 269,060 records collected from 20 publishers and databases, we conducted 5 rounds of relevance and quality screening, and ultimately analyzed 1,493 articles in breadth and depth. We contribute: (1) a systematic categorization of the literature, including 6 contribution types, 13 domains of application, and 4 decision levels; (2) taxonomies of 8 AI roles and 6 human roles, their inputs to decision-making, and their influences on each other; and (3) the identification of 4 research gaps and pathways forward. Our efforts unify scattered work into a coherent framework, strengthen the descriptive and rhetorical power of this field, and lay the groundwork for future research and policy development.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.