Optimal maternal feeding isotopic niche: influence of breeder trophic behaviour on larval growth and survival in bluefin tuna species

Le résumé fourni par la source

Maternal effects play a fundamental role in shaping early larval growth and survival in marine fishes. This study explores the relationship between maternal trophic ecology and larval growth in bluefin tunas, with a focus on Southern Bluefin Tuna (SBT) and an expanded dataset from multiple Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (ABT) populations incorporated into the General Bluefin Model (GBM). Daily growth and stable isotopes (δ 15 N and δ 13 C) were obtained from 80 pre-flexion SBT larvae and 355 pre-flexion larvae from the GBM dataset. Results revealed a significant negative linear trend between larval age and δ 15 N values, consistent with the gradual attenuation of maternally inherited isotopic signatures during development. Faster growing larvae showed significantly lower δ 15 N and δ 13 C values, indicating that maternal trophic behaviour and prey sources critically influence larval growth potential. Maternal isotopic niche breadth, inferred from larval isotope data, was markedly narrower in groups with optimal larval growth, suggesting that specialized (stenophagous) maternal feeding strategies promote enhanced offspring performance. These patterns were observed consistently in two bluefin species across seven different populations, despite geographic and temporal variability, highlighting a robust ecological link between maternal foraging behaviour and larval development. From these findings, we introduce the hypothesis of an Optimal Maternal Feeding Isotopic Niche, representing a constrained isotopic range associated with increased larval growth and survival. This framework advances our understanding of the influence of maternal trophic ecology on offspring fitness and offers valuable insights for the conservation and management of highly migratory pelagic species with complex reproductive strategies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.