Prospective MR Evaluation of Endolymphatic Hydrops Using Half-Dose Gadopiclenol

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gadopiclenol is a next-generation macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) distinguished by its high T1 relaxivity and kinetic stability. It was developed to address the clinical need for reduced gadolinium dosing while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy, thereby minimizing potential long-term risks associated with gadolinium retention. Although various neuroradiology applications have been explored, the potential benefits of gadopiclenol's increased T1 relaxivity have not been investigated for the purpose of evaluating endolymphatic hydrops (EH) using delayed contrast-enhanced inner ear imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 26 consecutive patients at our institution's otology clinic based on the 2015 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria for Ménière disease (MD), including acute or fluctuating symptoms of vertigo, hearing loss, tinnitus, or aural fullness. Each patient underwent 4-hour delayed contrast-enhanced inner ear imaging at 3T with half-dose (0.05 mmol/kg) GBCA administration using gadopiclenol. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and SNR were determined. Assessment of blood-labyrinthine barrier permeability, utricle-saccule discrimination, and endolymphatic hydrops was performed by 2 head and neck neuroradiologists. Image quality, SNR, and CNR were compared with previously published data that utilized the same technical parameters with a contrast dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. RESULTS: > .05). There was excellent interobserver agreement for the grading EH (κ > 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that 3D-FLAIR inner ear imaging using gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg is a reliable method for detecting clinically concordant EH and that image quality, based on qualitative and quantitative metrics, is comparable with a previously published study using gadobenate dimeglumine at a single-dose of 0.1 mmol/kg.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.