Case Report: A case of ruptured renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma leading to the diagnosis of TSC2/PKD1 contiguous gene syndrome
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is frequently complicated by renal lesions, including angiomyolipoma (AML), renal cysts, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Large deletions involving adjacent TSC2 and PKD1 genes cause TSC2 / PKD1 contiguous gene syndrome (PKDTS), which carries a risk of early renal decline. Epithelioid AML (eAML), to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously reported in children with PKDTS. Case presentation A 13-year-old boy with hypomelanotic macules and facial angiofibromas presented with acute abdominal pain and fever; CT revealed a ruptured heterogeneous 5-cm right renal cystic, and multiple cysts. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy confirmed epithelioid angiomyolipoma (eAML) via pathology and immunohistochemistry (cathepsin K+, CD10/p53 partial+, others negative). Neuroimaging and ophthalmology revealed TSC features; chromosomal microarray identified an ∼882-kb 16p13.3 deletion encompassing TSC2 / PKD1 , diagnosing PKDTS. Conclusions PKDTS may manifest in childhood as an eAML rupture. In pediatric TSC, eAML or RCC should not be excluded based on age. Atypical findings (e.g., calcification or necrosis) warrant early biopsy; non-diagnostic sequencing requires copy-number analysis (e.g., chromosomal microarray) to detect TSC2 deletions in TSC-featured patients and multiple renal cysts.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Case Report: A case of ruptured renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma leading to the diagnosis of TSC2/PKD1 contiguous gene syndrome
- Date Crossref
- 06/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.