Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Macroepidemiologic assessment of swine disease co-occurrences in the United States of America

2Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Swine producers frequently encounter polymicrobial disease challenges, with co-infections exacerbating clinical disease and complicating response strategies. This study aimed to characterize co-diagnosis patterns in swine by integrating confirmed diagnosis cases using a standardize diagnosis system (Dx code) from the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory. As a secondary objective, the study developed the concept and implemented a framework for the technological transfer of the Dx code system from ISU-VDL to the Ohio Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, and to gather Dx code data through an animal disease monitoring program, thereby creating a multi-institutional, confirmed tissue disease diagnosis database. The final collated database was harmonized and used to analyze 45,310 confirmed tissue diagnosis cases submitted between 2020 and 2025. Co-diagnosis was defined as the presence of two or more distinct etiologies within a single case. Overall, 52.62% of cases were co-diagnosed in 42 U.S. states, with a seasonal variation indicating reduced submissions and co-diagnosis rates during the summer months. The wean-to-market production phase accounted for 86.45% of co-diagnosed cases. The co-diagnosed cases were more abundant in respiratory and systemic anatomic systems, with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and Streptococcus suis being the predominant co-diagnosed pathogens. Age-specific trends revealed respiratory co-diagnoses peaking in nursery and grow-finish pigs, while digestive co-diagnoses were more common in suckling piglets. Statistical modeling using Conway-Maxwell-Poisson regression revealed that co-diagnosis cases involving bacterial and viral insults had significantly higher numbers of distinct etiologies (IRR = 2.48; CI: 1.66-3.66) compared with co-diagnosis cases without bacterial or viral involvement, with an expected count of 2.95 distinct etiologies per case. The study demonstrated the value of standardized diagnostic coding for epidemiological surveillance and highlights the complexity of co-infections in swine. Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of collaborative data sharing in enhancing swine health management strategies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Macroepidemiologic assessment of swine disease co-occurrences in the United States of America
Date Crossref
05/02/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Animal Virus Infections StudiesAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyMicrobial infections and disease research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.