Impact of an expanded male catch-up HPV vaccination program on the clinical and economic burden of HPV-associated diseases in Denmark: a modeling study
Rattachement africain : us, in, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Denmark's publicly funded routine HPV vaccination program has included boys born from 2005 onward, leaving earlier birth cohorts of young men potentially unprotected. METHODS: A published deterministic dynamic transmission metapopulation model was adapted to evaluate the impacts of a 3-year male catch-up vaccination program on the cases, deaths, and costs of HPV-associated diseases in Denmark over a 100-year time horizon. Routine gender-neutral HPV vaccination of adolescents with a nonavalent vaccine was modeled with and without a male catch-up program, at 4 catch-up vaccination coverage rates (VCRs) from 40% to 70%. RESULTS: Adding a temporary catch-up program for men born in 1997-2005 was projected to avert 253 HPV-associated cancer cases and 89 deaths at a VCR of 40%. Increasing coverage to 70% was estimated to avert 359 cases and 128 deaths. Catch-up vaccination may be considered cost-effective at all modeled VCRs, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €35,584-35,755 per quality-adjusted life year compared to routine adolescent vaccination alone. CONCLUSIONS: Expanding Denmark's male catch-up HPV vaccination program to include all men born in 1997-2005 would reduce the burden of HPV-associated cancers and diseases and may represent a cost-effective public health strategy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of an expanded male catch-up HPV vaccination program on the clinical and economic burden of HPV-associated diseases in Denmark: a modeling study
- Date Crossref
- 08/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.