Sequential electrocoagulation–Fungal biotreatment as a pretreatment approach for olive mill wastewater (Fez, Morocco)
Rattachement africain : Maroc. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The present study aims to evaluate a preliminary sequential treatment approach combining electrocoagulation (EC) and fungal bioremediation for the purification of olive mill wastewater (OMWW) diluted at a 1:10 ratio. EC, conducted with aluminum electrodes at a current density of 38 A·m⁻² for 4 h, achieved an initial reduction in chemical oxygen demand (COD) from 9520 to 4096 mg·L⁻¹ (56%) and in phenolic compounds (PC) from 0.55 to 0.28 g·L⁻¹ (49%). Subsequently, biological treatment with Aspergillus niger for 72 h further decreased COD to 2856 mg·L⁻¹ and PC to 0.137 g·L⁻¹, corresponding to cumulative removals of 70% and 75%, respectively. The treated effluent exhibited marked physicochemical improvements, including a decrease in turbidity to 15 NTU, a near-neutral pH (7.1), and a conductivity of 10.0 mS·cm⁻¹. The operational cost of the integrated EC–fungal process was estimated at 1.75 USD·m⁻³, with an associated carbon footprint of 3.4 kg CO₂·m⁻³. These values represent indicative laboratory-scale estimates, requiring validation at the pilot scale with a full accounting of electrode consumption, sludge management, and fungal biomass handling. Overall, the sequential EC–biotreatment constitutes a promising and sustainable pretreatment strategy for high-strength OMWW, facilitating subsequent polishing stages rather than serving as a stand-alone treatment solution.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Sequential electrocoagulation–Fungal biotreatment as a pretreatment approach for olive mill wastewater (Fez, Morocco)
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.