A real-world, multicentre, epidemiological study in Czech and Slovak adults with spinal muscular atrophy treated with risdiplam
Rattachement africain : cz, nl, sk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Real-world evidence about risdiplam therapy in adults with 5q spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) remains limited to outcomes in small cohorts, heterogeneous endpoints, and a short follow-up. We collected data of 59 adults with genetically confirmed 5q-SMA treated with risdiplam and analysed RULM, HFMSE, FVC % predicted, and ventilation status at baseline and at Month 6, 12, 24, and up to 36. The cohort comprised 59 adults (median age 28.5 years, range 17.0-59.2; 57.6% type 2, 33.9% type 3, and 8.5% type 1; 90.6% wheelchair users). During the follow-up period no patient lost motor function. RULM improved during the first 6 months and remained stable through 24-36 months. Over the follow-up, HFMSE showed a non-significant mean monthly increase of 0.05 points (P = 0.222), and RULM increased by 0.02 points per month (P = 0.079). No patient initiated ventilation during follow-up and forced vital capacity remained stable. In our adult population, including Type 1 survivors, risdiplam was associated with sustained upper-limb improvement, overall motor stability over 3 years, and a favourable respiratory trajectory without ventilation. Our findings indicate that stabilisation is a clinically meaningful target in advanced adult SMA patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A real-world, multicentre, epidemiological study in Czech and Slovak adults with spinal muscular atrophy treated with risdiplam
- Date Crossref
- 06/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.