Serum BDNF, PD-1, MMP-9 in AECOPD: prognostic value and a dual-axis risk model
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinal changes in neuroimmune biomarkers during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), their modulation by standard therapy, and prognostic implications for 90-day outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: = 213) groups; 80 healthy individuals served as controls. Serum levels of BDNF, PD-1, MMP-9, and cytokines were assessed at admission (T1), pre-discharge (T2), and 90-day follow-up (T3). Mixed-effects models evaluated biomarker trajectories, while Cox regression examined correlations with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with controls, AECOPD patients exhibited higher IL-6, TNF-α, PD-1, and MMP-9, alongside reduced BDNF and IL-10. Stable patients demonstrated partial biomarker normalization, whereas worsened patients retained a pro-inflammatory profile. Corticosteroids and antibiotics attenuated cytokine elevations, and oxygen therapy facilitated BDNF recovery. Low BDNF and high MMP-9 predicted spirometric decline, while elevated PD-1 and MMP-9 were associated with increased 90-day readmission risk. A dual-axis model incorporating neurotrophic and immune exhaustion markers outperformed GOLD classification for risk prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroimmune biomarkers capture recovery heterogeneity in AECOPD. The proposed dual-axis model improves prognostic accuracy and may inform personalized management strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Serum BDNF, PD-1, MMP-9 in AECOPD: prognostic value and a dual-axis risk model
- Date Crossref
- 05/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.