Metformin for Longevity and Sarcopenia: A Therapeutic Paradox in Aging
Rattachement africain : kr, in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Metformin is a first-line oral antidiabetic agent that has attracted increasing interest as a potential geroprotective therapy due to its ability to improve metabolic homeostasis, reduce oxidative stress, and attenuate chronic inflammation. However, its role in skeletal muscle aging and sarcopenia remains controversial. Observational and epidemiological studies suggest that metformin use is associated with a lower prevalence of sarcopenia, particularly in metabolically compromised or insulin-resistant older populations, where improvements in systemic metabolism and inflammatory burden may indirectly support muscle quality and function. In contrast, randomized interventional trials in metabolically healthy older adults indicate that metformin can blunt resistance exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy and protein synthesis, likely through sustained activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and consequent suppression of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling. This perspective argues that these apparently opposing outcomes reflect a con-text-dependent therapeutic paradox rather than inconsistent evidence. Metformin may provide metabolic protection in frail, insulin-resistant individuals, yet limit anabolic adaptations in physically active older adults. These findings emphasize the necessity for precision geropharmacological strategies to balance metabolic longevity with preservation of musculoskeletal health in aging populations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Metformin for Longevity and Sarcopenia: A Therapeutic Paradox in Aging
- Date Crossref
- 05/02/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.